Propagation of Religion in Indian context - An Islamic Perspective

Tuesday, 2 August 2016 | comments

By: Iftikhar Islam (@IftikharIslam)




In this 21st century, where the world respect the feelings of the people, yet the Islamic beliefs and tenants are questioned and degraded in the name of “security” and “protection”. Muslims find very difficult to follow their religious practice due to the atmosphere society has created, especially by the media. However, India is one of the few countries in the world who respects the religious feelings of the citizens and allow the propagation of those religious beliefs.

Propagation of Religions in Indian Laws:

The Preamble of the Indian Constitution has the word "secular", thereby implying that the State will not discriminate, patronise or meddle in the profession of any religion. However, it shields individual religions or groups by adding religious rights as fundamental rights. (Wikipedia) (Refer Indian Constitution, Art. 15)

Article 25 (1) of the Indian Constitution says: “Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion.”

Meaning of Public order, morality and health: This means that Article 25 & 26 are not absolute. No person can do such religious things which affect the public order, morality and health. For example, no one has right to conduct human sacrifice. No one can perform worship on busy highway or other public places which disturb the community. (Reference)

Articles 25 - 28 speaks about freedom of Religion and its related affairs.

Restrictions:

Section 153 (A) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) prohibits “Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion… and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony.” Section 295 (A) prohibits “Deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage reli­gious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or reli­gious beliefs.” Section 298 prohibits “Uttering, words, etc., with deliberate intent to wound the religious feelings of any person.”

The Indian Penal Code lays down certain restrictions on religious freedom (or on freedom of expression). No right is absolute under Indian Constitution. No one has any right to defame, insult, promote enmity, or hurt the religious sentiments of the people. Neither anyone can forcefully or fraudulently convert anyone to any religion.

Certain States have laws against conversion and prohibits forceful conversion (Read page 5, here).

Propagation of Islam in Islamic texts:

It is an obligation on every Muslim to propagate the teachings of Islam so that the message of Islam is reached to every human being on earth. It is a belief of the Muslims that Islam is a ‘way of life’ which is for the whole of humanity – not just only for the Muslims or the Arabs. The advent of Islam is to eradicate the evils of the society and make the humanity realise their purpose of existence. Islam, itself, stands for peace and submission.

The Quran commands Muslims to invite people to towards Islam. It says: “Invite (all) to the way of your Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching, and ague with them in ways that are most gracious.” (AQ, 16:125) It also says: “Let there arise out of you a band of people inviting to what is good, enjoining what is right, and forbidding what is wrong. They are the one who attain success.” (AQ, 3:104). The Quran commands the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him): “Say, "This is my way; I invite to Allah with insight…” (AQ, 12:108).

The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ (peace be upon him) commands “Convey my teachings even if it is a single sentence.” (Saheeh Bukhari 3461).

From the above references, it becomes evident that propagation of Islam is an obligation on every Muslim. However, even Islam has laid down certain restrictions on those who propagates it.

Restrictions:

The restrictions include forceful, fraudulent, or conversion with any influence.

The Quran says: “There is no compulsion in religion, truth stands out clear from error” (AQ, 2:256). It also says: “So remind, [O Muhammad]; you are only a reminder. You are not over them a controller.” (AQ, 88:21-22)

No Muslim can force anyone or influence him/her to accept Islam. It should be done purely out of one’s own will. The job of a Muslim is to convey the message of Islam and try to convince them – through wisdom, beautiful preaching, and debating. Once the person is convinced, he can choose his path - which one to follow - either to accept Islam or reject it. Any decision is welcome.


  


Get our articles directly in your inbox. Subscribe us to stay update
Email:


About the Author:
Iftikhar Islam - Passionate Writers
Iftikhar Islam is the Founder-Administrator of GPRF Network, Editor-in-Chief of Truth Arrived and Passionate Writers; an author best known for collaborating management strategies with Islamic knowledge for an all-round Islamic development as required in the 21st century. He holds a Post Graduate Degree in Business Management from IIPM School of Business & Economy; and an ardent of Islam, Comparative Religions, Education, Media and Law. | Know More |

Join him for more insights    

Dr. Zakir Naik in action: Sues Times Now and Arnab Goswami, others in line

Friday, 29 July 2016 | comments

By: Iftikhar Islam

Zakir Naik sues Times Now Arnab Goswami - Passionate Writers

This article is shifted to another place. Click here to read this article

ISIS is AISIS – Anti-Islamic State for Iraq & Syria, says Zakir Naik

Wednesday, 27 July 2016 | comments

By: Iftikhar Islam


Dr. Zakir Naik, famous orator and televangelist on Islam and Comparative Religions, rightly pointed out when it was asked to him about ISIS. He said how can it be ‘Islamic State’ when it kills innocent human beings. The Glorious Quran says, “If anyone kills any human being, unless for a murder or creating mischief in the land, it is as if he has killed the whole of humanity. And If anyone saves any human being, it is as if he has saved the whole of humanity” (5:32)

When every act of the organization is against Islam and its teachings, how come this organization be called as Islamic? It should be termed as “Anti-Islamic State for Iraq and Syria”.

He argues saying, “If I say that ‘I am a President of America’ will you all believe in me?” No, obviously not, so why the whole world believes the organization to be ‘Islamic State’ which is actually ‘Anti-Islamic’. The name “Islam” itself stands for Peace and Submission to Allah.

Therefore, those who believe this radical organization to be “Islamic’ has never understood Islam and its teachings.

If you analyze the attacks committed by this organization, you come to know that the majority – almost all - of the victims are Muslims and Muslim Nations. Never this organization has waged a war against Israel – who is openly against Islam.

Any sensible person can recognize that ISIS is not an organization of Muslims, neither it has links to Islam in any way. No matter how much ever they take the name of Islam, it is “Anti-Islamic State for Iraq and Syria.”


  


Get our articles directly in your inbox. Subscribe us to stay update
Email:


About the Author:
Iftikhar Islam - Passionate Writers
Iftikhar Islam is the Founder-Administrator of Passionate Writers and GPRF Network, incredible author best known for collaborating management strategies with Islamic knowledge for an all-round Islamic development as required in the 21st century. He holds a Post Graduate Degree in Business Management from IIPM School of Business & Economy; and an ardent of Islam, Comparative Religions, Media and Law. | Know More |

Join him for more insights    

Judiciary or Journalism: Reality of the ‘Media trail’ against Zakir Naik

Sunday, 17 July 2016 | comments

By: Iftikhar Islam

Judiciary or Journalism - Zakir Naik - Passionate Writers - Iftikhar Islam

When the Daily Star reported, obviously to create sensation and popularity, that one of the terrorists was influenced by Dr. Zakir Naik based on a video he shared last year. No matter what the terrorists have shared throughout their life, once if any terrorist shares anything related to celebrities, it becomes sensational news and media tries to pick it up and make news for their promotions.

Even Zakir Naik was trapped in the same run-for-popularity stunt by The Daily Star who ignored all those things terrorists have done all these years, but reported the video that one of the terrorists has shared of Zakir Naik, that too, a year before.

News without proof:

This News is picked by the Indian Media – hungry for fame, and defame Zakir Naik – and projected Zakir Naik as a villain of the game. Various defamatory names were given to him and tried hard to project him as a hard-liner, a radical preacher; only because he not only just preaches Islam, but also proves Islam right.


Zakir Naik has debated with the various International figures like Dr. William Campbell and Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, apart from national figures. He also challenged the Pope of Vatican, Rome, to have a public dialogue with him.

The teachings of Islam and the words of Zakir naik were taken out of context and the media tried hard to project Islam far beyond Zakir Naik. Indian Media also tried to change the message of Islam through the deviant sects and self-styled moulvis and projected Islam as a Sufi way of Life – which is untrue. Islam is based on the Quran and the authentic teachings of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the pious predecessors.
The Indian media failed to understand that Zakir Naik never influenced any human being to walk on the path of violence – leave about terrorism. The Indian media got their story to run for TRP. Zakir Naik is an escape -goat and the news runs for weeks.

Indian Media More concerned than Bangladesh Media:

The Indian media became more concerned about the attack and the link of Zakir Naik than the Bangaldeshi media. They have blown the news out of proportion and almost every one tried to link Zakir Naik to the terrorists – anyhow! One super journalist – who shouts – went to an extent to include other international speakers like Dr Bilal Philips, Assim Al Hakeem, Abdur Raheem Green and Hussain Yee (His research is so poor he says ‘Lee’. When he could not research on the name properly, think about the content which he talks about). This shows the end of the battle and a clear defeat of Jingo Journalism.

Even after the Bangadeshi media issued a clarification that nowhere The Daily Star said that Zakir Naik inspired the youth for radicalization and commit crimes like terrorism, Indian media brazenly continued speaking venom against him. When The Daily Star corrected their stance on the countries he is ban, the barefaced media preferred to spread lies and hate, for their ulterior motive, against him. To hide their faults and errors, they went on to research about the other views presented by him during Q&A sessions after his presentations.

Media Diversion:

Remember the whole scene was created to link Zakir Naik with Terrorism and Stop his preaching. Suddenly, when the Indian media felt that if they stick to the “story of terrorism” they cannot corner Zakir Naik and create public opinion against him. They have come up to refute various views he presented when he was asked by the public. How is Zakir Naik’s answer on Sania Mirza relevant here? What has homosexuals to do with this topic? How is the topic of female slaves related here? Does all these views of Zakir Naik promoted terrorism? It was just to divert the case and create a negative public opinion against him.

Media Hypocrisy:

Media Deliberately showed the sentences out of context even after knowing the context and clarification made many times. There are many statements of Zakir Naik which no media has ever taken. When they have researched to bring out those statements where they have found him saying “Every Muslim is a terrorist” haven’t they found the statements where he says “Revive Sanskrit”, “go back to your scriptures”, “let’s live harmoniously”, “you cannot take law in your own hands”, “we Hindus and Muslims will be united”, “India will be far superior then the Americans”, “I am proud of my country India” … I can just go on and on.

Indian Media could not digest the people accepting Islam in public. India is one of the few countries which gives their citizens to follow and propagate their religion. Every Indian has the right to accept the religion of their choice. Let the other spiritual gurus propagate their faith and let the people accept them as well. When the constitution has given the right and Zakir Naik is utilizing this right to propagate, then why the media is behind him? It’s an open secret for intellectual minds.

Win-Win for Zakir Naik:

The Week - Zakir Naik Cover Photo - Passionate Writers
On one hand The Daily Star corrected themselves, Indian authorities has given him clean chit, millions of other people got introduced to him. Even if Zakir Naik spend millions in promotions, he couldn’t reach out to every home like how the Indian media have done. Now the intellectual people will listen to him on YouTube and understand him rightly. On the other hand, the hypocrite media got exposed and the truth stood on the surface. Zakir Naik rightly said, "Jhut ka andera kitna hi gahra kyun nah ho, sachchai ki roushni use mitha dene ke liye kaafi hai", which means, how much ever the depth of darkness be, one ray of truth is enough to destroy it.

Now it’s time to those whom Dr. Zakir Naik has challenged for the debate to come out of their shells and accept the challenge. Let the Nation know the truth – which has already got been exposed.

“And (remember) when the disbelievers plotted against you (O Muhammad SAW) to imprison you, or to kill you, or to get you out (from your home); they were plotting and Allah too was planning, and Allah is the Best of the planners.” (Quran 8:30)


  


Get our articles directly in your inbox. Subscribe us to stay update
Email:


About the Author:
Iftikhar Islam - Passionate Writers
Iftikhar Islam is the Founder-Administrator of Passionate Writers and GPRF Network, incredible author best known for collaborating management strategies with Islamic knowledge for an all-round Islamic development as required in the 21st century. He holds a Post Graduate Degree in Business Management from IIPM School of Business & Economy; and an ardent of Islam, Comparative Religions, Media and Law. | Know More |

Join him for more insights    

Millions got inspired, how many of them are terrorists: Zakir Dhaka Link

Friday, 8 July 2016 | comments

By: Iftikhar Islam
 
Zakir Naik Dhaka Attack Bangladesh - Passionate Writers

Zakir Naik is a public figure who has changed the lives of millions (including me). There are many youths who has chosen a religious life because of his efforts. The struggle Zakir naik has done in changing the lives of the people is unthinkable. He was a medical student and was aspiring to become a cardiologist like Chris Barnard – who performed the world's first human heart transplant operation on 3 December 1967 - but he got inspired by Ahmed Deedat – a famous speaker known as Muslim scholar of the Christian Bible – and passionately followed his footstep and sacrificed his profession from a doctor of body to doctor of soul.

He fervently worked to spread the message of Islam in the most appropriate manner. Quoting the various verses from the scriptures, Dr Zakir Naik tries to bring the various communities close to each other. He takes open questions from the audience – which spiritual gurus rarely take – and gives them convincing answers in the light of various scriptures, science, history, with reasoning and logic. His unique style of presentation and convincing answers led millions to get inspired from him. If you see his videos – which are available on his YouTube channel or on Peace TV – you will find many people getting influenced by him and appreciating his work.

From the millions who got inspired from him, how many are terrorists? How many have walked on the path of violence? The handful who chose the wrong path cannot get influenced by him as he regularly condemns all kinds of terrorist attacks. They haven’t followed the wrong path due to his lectures but they read junk articles and watch junk videos which are supported by the Anti-Islamic forces to malign Islam and instigate the youth to walk on the path of violence. How can Zakir Naik be responsible for what they read and watch? How can Zakir Naik be responsible for their acts which are not even supported by him? He never supported terrorism in any way. His speeches are based on Islam and contemporary issues in the light of comparative religions, science, history and logic. He never promoted terrorism.

There are various centres operating in India for peace and harmony are influenced by him and his preaching. People are questioning their illogical beliefs to their gurus – whether it is Muslims or Non-Muslims – seeking answers for what they practice. A vast majority of those who are influenced by Zakir Naik are on the path of righteousness. Those who are on the path of violence can never get influenced by him. Even those who ‘like’ or ‘follow’ him on social networking sites and walked on the path of violence can never get influenced by him (for sure).

It is the conspiracy of Anti-Islamic forces to malign Zakir Naik and stop his work. They know once they succeed in stopping Zakir Naik, they can stop any Muslim who is trying to spread the message of Islam.


  


Get our articles directly in your inbox. Subscribe us to stay update
Email:


About the Author:
Iftikhar Islam - Passionate Writers
Iftikhar Islam is the Founder-Administrator of Passionate Writers and GPRF Network, incredible author best known for collaborating management strategies with Islamic knowledge for an all-round Islamic development as required in the 21st century. He holds a Post Graduate Degree in Business Management from IIPM School of Business & Economy; and an ardent of Islam, Comparative Religions, Media and Law. | Know More |

Join him for more insights    

My review on Arnab Goswami’s newshour debate on Zakir Naik’s issue

Sunday, 3 January 2016 | comments

By: Iftikhar Islam

While watching news on Times Now I saw the news scrolls related to Mangalore and the name “Naik” appeared. I was confirmed, this news is about Dr. Zakir Naik which was related to the hashtag #CommunalDoublegame, the topic of Arnab Goswami’s Debate 1 (on 30th Dec 2015). The hashtag clearly displayed the intention of Arnab Goswami and his stance against Zakir Naik. But in the debate he crossed the expectations and painted Zakir Naik and other communalists with the same brush. No doubt he will speak against Zakir Naik but I thought he may do it in a diplomatic way – following the ethics of journalism.

With half-baked research, Arnab laid various severe allegations against Dr. Zakir Naik that are absurd, ill-intended and malicious in nature. He has crossed all the levels in degrading Dr. Zakir Naik which he think he has done a wonderful thing. If he was truthful in his debate, then he would have invited people from IRF who knows Dr. Zakir Naik closely; or at least those who organize or listen to Dr. Zakir Naik’s speeches regularly. The cowardness of Arnab is exposed clearly when he started debating with those who doesn’t even know anything about Dr. Zakir Naik.

It is said in Hindi “Kutta bhi apne ilakhe mein sher banta hai” (Even dog becomes lion in his area). I openly challenge you Mr. Arnab to have a debate with me on the same topic. Only sitting in the studio and asking questions to the fans of Dr. Zakir Naik who cannot respond you while sitting at home. Is this an ethical journalism? You would have called them and asked in the studio in front of the Nation. Now Nation wants to know the answers to your allegations. Are you ready to take up the debate again? Brave men face the challenges while the cowards run.


Arnab Goswami Dr. Zakir Naik debate on Times Now


Let me briefly refute the allegations laid on Dr. Zakir Naik:

Dr. Zakir Naik is a self-proclaimed scholar:

It is ridiculous to speak without knowledge and when a journalist of high caliber speaks ignorantly then it becomes dangerous. Dr. Zakir Naik has never claimed himself to be a scholar in religion. I challenge Arnab and his whole team to produce a single sentence or incident where Dr. Zakir Naik has claimed himself to be a scholar. He says “I am a student of Islam and Comparative religions”. He further says “The value of Dr. Zakir Naik is ZERO in Islam”.

On the other hand Arnab is a self-claimed “honest” journalist. When Minakshi Lekhi, an advocate, accused Arnab of taking money, he got furious and said “Never ever make an accusation to an honest journalist”

 
Dr. Zakir Naik supports Osama Bin Laden:

Zakir Naik never supported Osama Bin Laden. He has neither spoken in favour not against him. He is a man who handles open Q&A sessions in which any person from the audience can pose any question on the subject of ‘Islam and Comparative Religions.’ When any one ask him about Osama Bin Laden he says I neither believe him to be a saint nor terrorist. I haven’t met him. Media can turn hero into villain and villain into hero. He is just silent on the issue because the Quran says “O you who believe! If a wicked person comes to you with any news, ascertain the truth, lest you harm people unwittingly, and afterwards become full of repentance for what you have done.” (Quran 49:6)

Regarding the statements Arnab Goswami quotes of Dr. Zakir Naik, it is out of context and more than a decade old. If you see the video completely you will get to know what Zakir Naik wants to say.
 
Dr. Zakir Naik says 9/11 is an inside job:

When Zakir Naik did said 9/11 is an inside job? Watch his (all-time favourite) video on the topic “Is Terrorism a Muslim monopoly?” you will get the complete understanding of what Zakir Naik said about 9/11. He just quotes the people who says 9/11 is an inside job. So according to your logic the government should also restrict even those people from addressing public gatherings?


Even if Dr. Zakir Naik says 9/11 is an inside job, what is wrong in it? Haven’t you researched about 9/11 yet? If no, then it is embarrassment on us having this kind of un-researched journalism in our country. Shame on you to claim having “investigative” journalism.

Just for a hint, study about False Flag Operations. I feel sorry to give an advice to a high caliber journalist of the nation.

Vandemataram issue:

Arnab feels “strange and ironical” when Zakir Naik says singing Vandemaratam goes against Islam and Hinduism. This shows how ignorant and illiterate Arnab is and how scholarly knowledge Zakir Naik possess. What Arnab knows when it comes to Islam or Hinduism? He just knows to shout and scream.


Vandemataram has some lines which directly goes against the teachings of Islam as well as the sacred scriptures of Hinduism. If Arnab Goswami doesn’t have the knowledge about religions then he should keep his mouth shut. Is vandemataram the criteria to judge the patriotism for the country? Is vandemataram the criteria to restrict people from addressing the large gatherings?


Dr. Zakir Naik provokes audience:

Arnab said, “I think he is saying the things deliberately to provoke the audience because that brings him viewer[ship]”. I can just laugh on Arnab’s analogy. How many lectures Arnab have seen of Dr. Zakir Naik? Dr. Zakir Naik has debated many prominent personalities in the world. Even after the debates nothing has happened. If Zakir Naik would have provoked the audience, then there would have been protests against him immediately. Why there are protests now, for those words he uttered more than a decade ago, and that too quoting him out of context. The reality is that people are accepting Islam openly in his programs that seems to be danger for them in the future.

Dr. Zakir Naik speaks venom:

You need to understand the meaning of ‘venom’. By the way in which school have you studied Arnab? Who has appointed you in Times Now? What you do at 9 pm daily in your studio? Do you spread love? You spread brotherhood? What you do in the studio is venom. You speak those things which even you - if you sit quietly - ponder upon it, you will laugh on yourself.


“Let’s come to the common term first”, “Go back to the scriptures”, “Believe in one God” are these statements venom? After the debate, in the concluding sessions he say “I was just replying to allegations, I am not here to hurt the sentiments of the people” even this is venom? “I don’t know who Osama is, I have never met him… I cannot say whether he is a saint or a terrorist”, “When you get the news verify it”, even now he is speaking venom? When the media asked him about Sadhvi Pragya Singh, he said the same thing “I don’t know who Sadhvi Pragya Singh is, I cannot say whether she is a saint or a terrorist” Do you mean to say these sentences are venom as well?

Shiva and Ganesh issue:

Arnab says he didn’t even want to quote what Zakir Naik has said about Shiva and Ganesh. Why didn’t Arnab quote Zakir Naik on this issue? He very well escaped saying, “you want to me repeat what he says in the context of Shiva and Ganesh, I won’t repeat it.” Why?


The explanation Zakir Naik has given is in the context when non-Muslim friends and neighbors force or offer Muslims to eat Prasad. In answer to this he gave an example of Shiva and Ganesh and ask them to prove that ‘Shiva is God’ then we will eat ‘Prasad’. Because Muslims cannot eat those food on which anyone’s name is taken besides God. Even if anyone has taken the name of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) on the food, the food becomes prohibited for the Muslims.


In the context to explain that Muslims won’t eat food which is offered to any deities beside God, he narrated the story of Shiva and Ganesh. If it is false, then correct Zakir Naik with true version of the story. Dr. Zakir Naik is open for correction. The narration is only for the sake of knowledge, not to degrade or hurt anyone. Dr. Zakir Naik often quotes this ayat (verse) of the Quran which says “Revile not ye those whom they call upon besides Allah, lest in the ignorance they will revile Allah” (Quran 6:108)

If the true story hurts you then stories and films should hurt you more. Those who write stories and make films should be restricted from making more films. The Director of the film ‘O My God’ Umesh Shukhla; and Producers Akshay Kumar, Paresh Rawal and Yashvini Yardi; should be banned for showing all those stuffs in the movie. The team of the film ‘PK’ - Rajkumar Hirani, Vidhu Vinod Chopra, Abhijat Joshi, Aamir Khan, Anushka Sharma and others - should be restricted from making more films.


Why only target Zakir Naik and leave others? Only because Zakir Naik is a Muslim? Or more and more people accept Islam in Zakir Naik’s gathering?


This is a brief response to some of the allegations which Arnab has deliberately put on Dr. Zakir Naik. I could have given point by point refutation to Arnab Goswami. I don’t want the response to get lengthy. There are many illogical and nonsensical statements given by him which I thought of not worth responding.

I didn’t touch the four points he has given to compare Zakir Naik to the other communalist. It is not worth responding. The audience of Zakir Naik consist of the people of all faiths but that communalist have only people of his community. All the four points which Arnab mentions fit the other communalist and not Zakir Naik.


Before concluding the response, I would like to throw some light on how Arnab fools the viewers:

Misquoting the Law:


He quoted section 295 of IPC against Zakir Naik. Here are the exact words of the section. “295. Injuring or defiling place of worship with intent to insult the religion of any class. — Whoever destroys, damages or defiles any place of worship, or any object held sacred by any class of persons with the intention of thereby insulting the religion of any class of persons or with the knowledge that any class of persons is likely to consider such destruction, damage or defile­ment as an insult to their religion..”


Does this section fits Zakir Naik in ANY manner? I hope Arnab understands these simple words of the section. You don’t have to be a lawyer to interpret this section and apply on Dr. Zakir Naik. The other sections of IPC and CrPC and Article 19 (2) of the Constitution of India is subject of discussion when it comes to application on Dr. Zakir Naik. Being a student of Law, I can just laugh on Arnab.


Arnab lacks research:

By quoting unwanted section for Dr. Zakir Naik, he showed the level of research he has. The other allegations and sentences he quoted against Zakir Naik has already been answered by Dr. Zakir Naik before and relayed on Peace TV multiple times and available on YouTube. The allegations are taken from a decade old tapes which Zakir Naik already answered in his new tapes.


Arnab and his team doesn’t know the countries in which Zakir Naik is banned. Times Now was regularly displaying US and UK in the countries that banned Zakir Naik. When did US banned Zakir Naik from entering in their state?


Arnab fools the viewers by inviting unrelated persons as panelists, keep few photocopies of the papers, scream and do not allow the person to speak. Even if he allow once, he takes the time to refute and does not allow the person to refute his baseless allegations and goes on to another panelist and divert the question.


Henry Anatole Grunwald said “Journalism can never be silent…” and Arnab understood it the other way!


If you want to know about Dr. Zakir Naik in the right perspective, then watch his videos for yourself (here: www.youtube.com/DrZakirChannel) and you be the judge whether Zakir Naik is the prince of peace or preacher of hate.


  


Get our articles directly in your inbox. Subscribe us to stay update
Email:


About the Author:
Iftikhar Islam - Passionate Writers
Iftikhar Islam is the Founder-Editor of Passionate Writers and GPRF (a non-profit org. in Belgaum), incredible author best known for collaborating management strategies with Islamic knowledge for an all-round Islamic development as required in the 21st century. He holds a Post Graduate Degree in Business Management from prestigious IIPM School of Business & Economy; and an ardent of Islam, Comparative Religions, Media and Law. | Know More |

Join him for more insights    

It’s not about BEEF, It’s about DOMINANCE.

Thursday, 1 October 2015 | comments



Air Force personnel's father killed by mob near Delhi over beef rumours


Recent incident in U.P. didn’t shake me at all as we all know the agendas of BJP and the right wings clearly. After Narendra Modi becoming the Prime Minister, the Right Wing has become more active than before. Last time we have seen the incident of Nagaland lynching for alleged rape, this time for alleged consumption of beef. No wonder we see these kinds of incidents in the future too. I say, O Muslims be ready to get butchered… it’s your time now. 

We see continuous hate inculcating in the minds of youth towards minorities – especially Muslims – that the youth are afraid to befriend these minorities. People search for the excuse to harass the minorities and put fear in their hearts. Right from an early age these ‘karyakartas’ are trained to hate the minorities and torture them whenever they gets an opportunity.

I say, this incident of lynching a MUSLIM is not because of eating beef, but to show the supremacy and inculcate fear in the hearts of the Muslims. “Beef” is just an excuse; their agenda is to show supremacy. I call them hypocrites. They can only do such things because they do not have guts to stand for the truth or face the truth. Truth is always bitter for those who hate it. If you are working to inculcate fear in the hearts of Muslims; remember, a true Muslim only fears Allah and no one else. 

If beef is the only issue, then why India is the largest export in Beef? According to the data released by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, India exported 2.4 million tonnes of beef and veal in FY2015, compared to 2 million tonnes by Brazil and 1.5 million by Australia. Data from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) shows that most of India’s beef exports go to Asian countries. India’s beef exports have been growing at an average of nearly 14 per cent each year since 2011, and fetching India as much as $4.8 billion in 2014. Last year, India for the first time earned more from the export of buffalo meat than it did from Basmati rice.

There are approximately 3,600 slaughterhouses operating legally in India. However, there are estimated to be over 30,000 illegal slaughterhouses.


In an article published in The Hindu newspaper, by the title ‘Vegetarianism, tolerance and discrimination’ Tarunabh Khaitan, a researcher on anti-discrimination law, at the University of Oxford, being a vegetarian, shared the incident, “Madhavi Kapoor wanted to sell her apartment in a posh housing society in Pune to a Muslim family. She faced all sorts of obstacles and discouragement. She told a news-channel that some gentleman asked her “Toh phir aapko chalega lawn par bakri katne ko.” (“So slaughter of goats on the lawn will be ok with you?”).

How likely this (or any, for that matter) Muslim family is to slaughter goats on the lawn is questionable. This gentleman would probably have had no objection to selling the flat to meat-eating Hindus, but Farrah, my vegetarian Muslim friend, would certainly invite hostility. The incident shows how, on the pretext of vegetarianism, we are building exclusive intolerant ghettoes in our cities.”

It is okay when any Hindu eats beef, even if he is a Brahmin, but it is not tolerated to be even a vegetarian if you are a Muslim or a Christian. I am sure those who talk about beef ban themselves eat beef. This is the pathetic situation we are living in. If we want India to be really a peaceful place to live in, then we should lay down strict laws on equality and ban those organizations that instill hate and intolerance towards other faith. 

Hypocrisy of the Police:

When the family had lost its main member and the other was fighting for his life, the police was busy in collecting the samples of meat from the victim's home. It is not crime in U.P. to posses the beef, slaughtering is prohibited. There is no proof that the family has slaughtered cow for their festival. Even if the samples of the meat proves it to be a beef (which it is not), they have not committed any crime. By collecting the samples of the meat and sending it to forensic, the police has shown their hypocrisy. 

If the maintainers of law misuse it, then on whom do we trust?

I am not well since past two days but the incident didn’t allowed me to rest without writing on this issue. I hope the good people of the society break their silence and stand for justice.



  


Get our articles directly in your inbox. Subscribe us to stay update
Email:


About the Author:
Iftikhar Islam - Passionate Writers
Iftikhar Islam is the Founder-Editor of Passionate Writers and GPRF (a non-profit org. in Belgaum), incredible author best known for collaborating management strategies with Islamic knowledge for an all-round Islamic development as required in the 21st century. He holds a Post Graduate Degree in Business Management from prestigious IIPM School of Business & Economy; and an ardent of Islam, Comparative Religions, Media and Law. | Know More |

Join him for more insights    

My Tribute to the proud son of India - Dr. APJ Abdul Kalaam

Sunday, 16 August 2015 | comments

By: +Iftikhar Islam

I apologize I couldn’t pen down my tribute to the great personality of India. My schedule didn’t permit me to write about him. I am sorry…

It was sad to hear the news of the demise of one of the best presidents of India, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalaam, a man who believed in struggle with simplicity. He worked hard and smart in his life. By his early childhood, his family had become poor. At an early age, he sold newspapers to supplement his family's income. He has seen poverty very closely.

He worked hard to accomplish his dream of becoming a ‘fighter pilot’ but missed narrowly as his place was ninth in qualifiers and only eight positions were available in the IAF. When he was working on a senior class project, the Dean was dissatisfied with his lack of progress and threatened to revoke his scholarship unless the project was finished within next three days. Abdul Kalam completed the task within the given time, satisfied his dean and later received appreciation from him.

He started his career by designing a small helicopter for the Indian Army, but remained unconvinced by his choice of a job at DRDO. In 1969, Abdul Kalam was transferred to the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) where he was the project director of India's first Satellite Launch Vehicle (SLV-III). His research and educational leadership brought him great laurels and prestige in the 1980s, which prompted the government to initiate an advanced missile programme under his directorship.

In 1998, along with cardiologist Soma Raju, Abdul Kalam developed a low cost coronary stent, named the "Kalam-Raju Stent". In 2012, the duo designed a rugged tablet computer for health care in rural areas, which was named the "Kalam-Raju Tablet".

“It was Kalam who had formulated the country's Integrated Missile Programme and propelled India towards emerging as a missile power.” G Satheesh Reddy, Scientific Adviser to Defence Minister said. "His dreams are never-ending. The greatest tribute we can pay him is to fulfill his dreams and realise his vision for the country," he added.

Saraswat, a former DRDO chief, said “the former President brought in such values among youth that today, every youth gets motivated by the sheer mention of the name ‘Dr Kalam’”

For his work on the development of ballistic missile and launch vehicle technology, he came to be known as the ‘Missile Man of India’. He never owned a television, and was in the habit of rising at 6:30 or 7 a.m and sleeping by 2 a.m.

I haven’t found anyone speaking ill about Dr Abdul Kalam. His simplicity and dedication for his work helped him to achieve extra ordinary goals in life. Even his critics were silent on his death and spoke only positive and acknowledged his achievements for the development of this country. This shows how his personality has even convinced the critics.

Abdul Kalam said “For great men, religion is a way of making friends; small people make religion a fighting tool." This is the principle we follow in our organization, GPRF, too. We meet people of other faiths to establish communal harmony in the society. People use religion to divide but we use religion to unite.

We know he has influenced millions of people, but as a human being he too has committed errors. I pray Allah to forgive his short comings and reward him for all the good he has done and grant him the highest paradise. Aameen


  


Get our articles directly in your inbox. Subscribe us to stay update
Email:


About the Author:
Iftikhar Islam - Passionate Writers
Iftikhar Islam is the Founder-Editor of Passionate Writers and GPRF (a non-profit org. in Belgaum), incredible author best known for collaborating management strategies with Islamic knowledge for an all-round Islamic development as required in the 21st century. He holds a Post Graduate Degree in Business Management from prestigious IIPM School of Business & Economy; and an ardent of Islam, Comparative Religions, Media and Law. | Know More |

Join him for more insights    

Yakub put to gallows… What about others in line?

Wednesday, 5 August 2015 | comments

By: +Iftikhar Islam


The moment I got the news about Yakub Memon’s Death Penalty and rejection of “mercy” petitions, I remembered the execution of Afzal Guru. Like Afzal Guru, I was not aware about Yakub Memon too (before the execution). I thought of researching on his life and present my views on this issue too.

To be very clear even I am among those who has criticized the Death Penalty given to Yakub Memon. Those eminent personalities who criticized the judgment includes Research and Analysis Wing officer B. Raman, former Supreme Court judge Justice H. S. Bedi, former Supreme Court judge Markandey Katju, Hussain Zaidi, Ram Jethmalani, Asaduddin Owaisi, R. Jagannathan, and many more… who asked for implementation of the Srikrishna Commission report.

“About 300 prominent citizens, including at least eight retired judges of the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court, have urged India's president to commute Memon's sentence to life in prison, reflecting what appears to be growing uneasiness in India with the death penalty.”

In his book “Turning Point: A Journey through Challenges” Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam wrote "one of the more difficult tasks for me as President was to decide on the issue of confirming capital punishment awarded by courts ... to my surprise ... almost all cases which were pending had a social and economic bias… This gave me an impression that we were punishing the person who was least involved in the enmity and who did not have a direct motive for committing the crime,"

It is clear that the cases of death penalty are facing “social and economic” bias. After hanging Dhananjoy Chatterjee on 14th August 2004, in the span of almost eleven years, three convicts are put to death – all were Muslims. Apart from putting Ajmal Kasab into gallows, the decisions of both Afzal Guru and Yakub Memon were questioned, with due respect to the Supreme Court.

Yakub was a qualified Charted Accountant and in 1992 he won an award for the best chartered accountant in the Memon community. When he was linked in the ‘1993 Bombay bombings’ with his brother (and family), he left India. He was suspected because he was the one who handled the accounts of his brothers. He returned India in hope that he may get light sentence and surrendered to Indian authorities. He returned back carefully collecting the information, which included photos and audio clips, required for Indian authorities about Tiger Memon, Jaliawala and Dawood Ibrahim. This information helped India to confirm about the presence of D-Gang in Pakistan.
[For more info read: The Yakub Memon Story – The Man who helped India expose Pakistan role in 1993 Bombay Blasts ]

The Director of CBI, K Vijay Rama Rao, said that the “Memons had surrendered because they had had no other option.” If it is true, why Tiger, Jaliawala and Dawood have not yet surrendered?

Justice Srikrishna Report:

J. Srikrishna Report says, the series of blasts were the reaction of the events happened in Ayodhya and December 1992 & January 1993 Bombings.

"From 8th January 1993 at least there is no doubt that the Shiv Sena and Shiv Sainiks took the lead in organising attacks on Muslims and their properties under the guidance of several leaders of the Shiv Sena from the level of Shakha Pramukh to the Shiv Sena Pramukh Bal Thackeray who, like a veteran General, commanded his loyal Shiv Sainiks to retaliate by organised attacks against Muslims.” J. S. Report says. The riots happened because of the “statements and acts and writings and directives issued by the Shiv Sena Pramukh Bal Thackeray.”

According the Report “Tiger Memon and his family had suffered extensively during the riots”

Justice:

Justice will be done to the Indian society if the culprits of “Babri Masjid Demolition” and “Bombay riots 1992-93” are booked and punished as enthusiastically as the Death Penalty given to Yakub Mamon. Those were the events that led the series of Bombay bombings to happen. Justice Srikrishna commission report should be implemented and the culprits should be booked and punished without mercy, if the judiciary really wants to do justice.s

Those who convicted and are in death row should also be sent into the gallows as earnestly as it is done in case of Yakub Memon


Famous journalist Rahul Kanwal of India Today writes, “On Friday, Arun Jaitley told India Today in an interview that the government does not decide who is to be punished on the basis of their religion. But the reality is that Devinder Pal Singh Bhullar, Balwant Singh Rajaona and Rajiv Gandhi's assassins have been able to escape the noose because of the backing of political parties in their states.” He further writes “Arun Jaitley says that rioters will also be made to face the gallows, just like terrorists. But the fact is that successive governments in Maharashtra made no attempt to implement the findings of the Justice Srikrishna report on the Mumbai riots in which 900 people were killed.”


Let’s see how the existing government makes attempts to put into gallows for those who instigated the riots and were responsible for killing of 900 innocents. The convict who was responsible for killing 257 innocents is punished and the culprits who were responsible for killing 900 innocents are free – living normal life


Supreme Court should not allow political influence to dominate when it comes to justice. If criminals are escaping the real punishment and innocents are getting harsher punishments, then there will be no hope on judiciary of India.

My response to the comments against “those who supported Yakub Memon’s mercy plea”:

“All those who asked for mercy to be shown towards Memon should be tried for being enemies of the country… These people had not lost anyone in the Mumbai attacks and were thus pleading for leniency.” – Shiv Sena.


What about those who were responsible for instigating 1992-93 riots? It was a “cause and effect” according to J. Srikrishna report. Should they be given Bharat Ratna? Why Shiv Sena is silent on this issue? “He Who Seeks Equity Must Do Equity” – Legal Maxim.


“Intelligence shd keep a tab on all (expt relatives & close friends) who assembled bfr Yakub Memon's corpse. Many are potential terrorists” - Tripura Governor Tathagata Roy (tweet)


This happens because of lack of knowledge. ‘Getting knowledge before speaking’ is the “first commandment” every politician should remember. The argument given by Roy while speaking to Indian Express displayed the lack of knowledge about Islamic rulings and Muslim culture about funerals. I don’t go into the details here


Regarding “potential terrorists”, only one sentence “Keep your mouth shut!!!” We are more loyal to this country than you are. Period.


How come the governor of Tripura interfering in the matters of ‘Intelligence Bureau’? May be he needs to resign from the post and join IB to utilize his skills effectively. 


The person who was responsible for the killing of 257 innocents is put to gallows and those who are responsible for the killing of 900 innocents are free – living normal life. Are they not “Potential Terrorists”!!!



  


Get our articles directly in your inbox. Subscribe us to stay update
Email:


About the Author:
Iftikhar Islam - Passionate Writers
Iftikhar Islam is the Founder-Editor of Passionate Writers and GPRF (a non-profit org. in Belgaum), incredible author best known for collaborating management strategies with Islamic knowledge for an all-round Islamic development as required in the 21st century. He holds a Post Graduate Degree in Business Management from prestigious IIPM School of Business & Economy; and an ardent of Islam, Comparative Religions, Media and Law. | Know More |

Join him for more insights    
Your valuable feedback and esteemed suggestions are most welcome at:
Subscribe our articles on Google group

Follow by Email

 
Copyright © 2011. Passionate Writers | This Blog is under GPRF Network
Read our Copyright Policy before 'posting' our articles on your blogs etc.
PW Template Created by Creating Website Published by Mas Template
Taken from Johny Template | Edited by Iftikhar Islam